Skip to content

Disputed Questions

Philosophia: Theologia: Scientia

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Podcast

Tag: Act potency distinction

Aquinas, Atheism, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Thomism5 Comments

Response To A Tippling Philosopher On Act and Potency

November 13, 2019 Harrison Jennings

Over at the “A Tippling Philosopher” blog, Jonathan MS Pearce has written a brief post critiquing the Thomistic understanding of actuality and potentiality (or act and potency, or actus and potentia). His aim in doing so appears to be to … Continue reading Response To A Tippling Philosopher On Act and Potency

Aquinas, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Thomism6 Comments

Defending the 24 Thomistic Theses: The Second Thesis

May 24, 2019May 24, 2019 Harrison Jennings

In a previous post, we began a series explaining and defending the “twenty-four Thomistic theses,” a list of theses which constitute the major, central principles of the philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas and the tradition which has followed him. The … Continue reading Defending the 24 Thomistic Theses: The Second Thesis

Aquinas, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Thomism20 Comments

Defending the 24 Thomistic Theses: The First Thesis

March 2, 2019 Harrison Jennings

The “Twenty-Four Thomistic Theses” is a list of theses accepted by the Sacred Congregation of Studies as the major, central principles of the philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas. These principles identify the philosophy of Thomism and distinguish it from other … Continue reading Defending the 24 Thomistic Theses: The First Thesis

Categories

  • Aquinas
  • Atheism
  • Christianity
  • Classical Theism
  • Existence of God
  • Metaphysics
  • Natural Theology
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Religion
  • Theism
  • Thomism
  • Translations
  • Uncategorized

Enter your email address to follow this blog and be signed up for our newsletter.

Join 175 other followers
Follow Disputed Questions on WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • Update (6/19/22)
  • Translatio: Bonaventure’s Commentary on the Sentences, Prooemium (Part 1)
  • The Agony Argument and the Privation Theory of Evil: A Response to Watkins
  • Translatio: The “Defensiones Theologiae” of Capreolus, Prologue I.1
  • Schmid on Existential Inertia: A Systematic Analysis: Part I, Preliminary Remarks
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Disputed Questions
    • Join 175 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Disputed Questions
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar